Red Hat's Secret Patent Deal and the Fate of JBoss Developers
Red Hat?s Secret Patent Deal and the Fate of JBoss Developers
Nov 12, 2010, 20 :35 UTC (0 Talkback[s]) (926 reads)
(Other stories by Bruce Perens)
"When patent troll Acacia sued Red Hat in 2007, it ended with a bang: Acacia?s patents were invalidated by the court, and all software developers, open-source or not, had one less legal risk to cope with. So, why is the outcome of Red Hat?s next tangle with Acacia being kept secret, and how is a Texas court helping to keep it that way? Could the outcome have placed Red Hat in violation of the open-source licenses on its own product?
"The suit in question ? Software Tree LLC v. Red Hat, Inc. ? claimed that JBoss, the well-known Java web software, infringed upon U.S. Patent No. 6163776 (PDF), which essentially claims invention of the object-relational database paradigm. In that paradigm, an object in an object-oriented software language represents a database record, and the attributes of the object represent fields in the database, making it possible for programmers to access a database without writing any SQL. It?s a common element in most web programming environments today."
Complete Story
Related Stories:
Microsoft, Motorola Patent Battle: A Lose-Lose-Lose Proposition(Oct 06, 2010)
Red Hat settles patent case with Acacia - shares few details(Oct 05, 2010)
Standing up to a patent bully (May 12, 2010)
Total victory for open source software in a patent lawsuit(May 03, 2010)
Red Hat & Novell Beat IP Innovation and in Marshall, Texas, too(May 01, 2010)
Acacia Denies Patent Claim is an Attack on Open Source, Denies Any Microsoft Role(Oct 22, 2007)
9:11 PM
|
Labels:
developers,
JBoss,
Patent,
Secret
|
This entry was posted on 9:11 PM
and is filed under
developers
,
JBoss
,
Patent
,
Secret
.
You can follow any responses to this entry through
the RSS 2.0 feed.
You can leave a response,
or trackback from your own site.
0 comments:
Post a Comment